Mappings
Overview
routing.projections.mappings turns a projection score into named routing bands that decisions can consume.
Use mappings when:
- decisions should read semantic labels such as
balance_reasoningorverification_requiredinstead of raw thresholds - one score should feed several decisions through reusable named outputs
- routing policy review should happen over named bands instead of inline numeric comparisons
What Problem Does It Solve?
Scores are useful internal signals, but decision rules should not depend on everyone remembering that "0.82 means reasoning tier" or "0.35 means verification required."
Mappings solve that by turning numeric thresholds into reusable policy names.
That gives you two benefits:
- one score can feed many decisions
- threshold policy lives in one place instead of being repeated across routes
This is also the point where a projection becomes decision-visible. In the current implementation, decisions can only reference mapping.outputs[*].name, not score names or partition names.
How Mappings Behave at Runtime
The current implementation supports method: threshold_bands only.
Each output declares one or more bounds using:
ltltegtgte
Important runtime details:
- outputs are checked in order
- the first matching output wins
- if no output matches, the mapping emits nothing
- optional
calibrationcomputes a confidence for the matched projection output
The supported calibration method today is sigmoid_distance, which derives confidence from how far the score sits from the nearest threshold boundary.
Canonical YAML
routing:
projections:
mappings:
- name: difficulty_band
source: difficulty_score
method: threshold_bands
calibration:
method: sigmoid_distance
slope: 10.0
outputs:
- name: balance_simple
lt: 0.18
- name: balance_medium
gte: 0.18
lt: 0.48
- name: balance_complex
gte: 0.48
lt: 0.82
- name: balance_reasoning
gte: 0.82
decisions:
- name: reasoning_math
priority: 250
rules:
operator: AND
conditions:
- type: domain
name: math
- type: projection
name: balance_reasoning
DSL
PROJECTION mapping difficulty_band {
source: "difficulty_score"
method: "threshold_bands"
calibration: { method: "sigmoid_distance", slope: 10 }
outputs: [
{ name: "balance_simple", lt: 0.18 },
{ name: "balance_medium", gte: 0.18, lt: 0.48 },
{ name: "balance_complex", gte: 0.48, lt: 0.82 },
{ name: "balance_reasoning", gte: 0.82 }
]
}
ROUTE reasoning_math {
PRIORITY 250
WHEN domain("math") AND projection("balance_reasoning")
MODEL "openai/gpt5.4"
}
Config Fields
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
name | mapping identifier |
source | score name to read from |
method | currently threshold_bands |
calibration | optional confidence model for the matched output |
outputs[].name | decision-visible projection name |
outputs[].lt/lte/gt/gte | threshold bounds for that output |
Dashboard
Config -> Projectionsedits mappings in canonical config formConfig -> Decisionscan reference mapping outputs with condition typeprojection
When to Use
Use mappings when:
- several routes should share the same tier names
- you want readable decision rules such as
projection("verification_required") - threshold policy should be centralized and auditable
When Not to Use
Do not use mappings when:
- the decision should reference a raw signal directly
- the score is only diagnostic and not part of routing policy
- you have not first defined the score that this mapping should read from
Design Notes
- Keep output names policy-oriented so decisions read like routing intent, not threshold math.
- Keep threshold bands monotonic, ordered, and easy to audit.
- Let decisions consume named outputs with
type: projectionrather than repeating numeric thresholds in multiple places. - Avoid overlapping bands unless you intentionally want order-dependent behavior; the runtime returns the first matching output.